Sample draft: bail application, para 7
The applicant has been in custody for over three years. In , the Supreme Court held that a constitutional court can grant bail where a trial won't finish soon. See of that judgment. Reliance is also placed on .
Check a draft
Courts have set aside orders built on invented precedents. Paste your draft, or upload the file, and Misaal checks every authority against the judgments themselves.
Bail application.docx
Word or PDF, read only to take out the text
In Mohd. Irfan Qureshi v. National Investigation Agency, [2025] 2 SCR 512, a three-Judge Bench held that bail must follow...
Check
Union of India v. K.A. NajeebFound: [2021] 1 SCR 443
QuotationFound word for word
Mohd. Irfan Qureshi v. NIANot found in any judgment in Misaal
K.A. Najeeb, para 73This judgment's numbered paragraphs end at paragraph 21: there is no paragraph 73.
2 need attention2 verified
Verification reportEach result with the Court's own words, timestamped, with a fingerprint of this draft
Download report (PDF)
A sample bail application with one fake case and one wrong paragraph in it. This is what the check finds.
Sample draft: bail application, para 7
The applicant has been in custody for over three years. In , the Supreme Court held that a constitutional court can grant bail where a trial won't finish soon. See of that judgment. Reliance is also placed on .
Verified
Union of India v. K.A. Najeeb
Found: [2021] 1 SCR 443
Needs attention
Para 73
This judgment's numbered paragraphs end at paragraph 21: there is no paragraph 73.
Needs attention
Mohd. Irfan Qureshi v. NIA
Not found in any judgment in Misaal. Check the original before citing it.
A case or citation that isn't in the judgments Misaal holds is flagged.
A real case name paired with another judgment's citation is caught.
Quotations are compared word for word, including a dropped "not" or a changed number.
A pin like "para 73" is checked against the paragraphs the judgment actually has.
IPC and BNS pairings are checked, and a code that doesn't fit the date of the offence is flagged.
If a later Supreme Court sentence mentions the case with "overruled" or similar, you see it to read yourself.
An uploaded file is read only to take out the text, and it isn't kept.
Word (.docx) and PDF files with text in them, up to 10 MB. A scanned PDF has no text to read. Old .doc files need saving as .docx first.
No. It means it isn't in the judgments Misaal holds, so check the original before you cite it.
They are private reporters, so those numbers can't be checked. Misaal marks them as could not be checked, and matches the case name where it can.
No. It shows later sentences for you to read, but whether a case is still good law is for counsel to decide.
Paste it, or upload the file.