Commercial and arbitration
Arbitration and commercial disputes, by your facts.
Describe the award or the clause. Get the paragraphs from the Supreme Court and the High Courts, with para and page.
-
Your facts, in your words
Application to set aside arbitral award under Section 34, patent illegality and public policy
Find matching judgments
-
Strong match
Gayatri Balasamy v. M/s ISG Novasoft Technologies
Supreme Court · [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2080
Strong match
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. v. State of Goa
Supreme Court · [2023] 8 S.C.R. 379
Strong match
M/s Mahavir Prasad Gupta and Sons v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court · FAO (COMM) 170/2023
-
Gayatri Balasamy v. M/s ISG Novasoft Technologies[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2080
Section 34(2-A) stipulates that an award may be set aside when it is vitiated by patent illegality appearing on the face of the award.
Para 30 Open in the original PDF
The Arbitration Act, by section.
Mention the section in your description, along with the facts.
| Section | What it's about |
|---|---|
| Section 8 | Referring parties to arbitration |
| Section 9 | Interim measures by the court |
| Section 11 | Appointment of arbitrators |
| Section 12(5) | Ineligibility of an arbitrator |
| Section 34 | Setting aside an award |
| Section 36 | Enforcement of an award |
| Section 37 | Appeals |
Try one of these.
Real descriptions you can paste into Misaal, then change to fit your matter.
-
Application to set aside arbitral award under Section 34, patent illegality and public policy
-
Arbitration clause lets one party appoint the sole arbitrator, unilateral appointment is invalid, Section 11
-
Section 34 petition filed after three months and thirty days, whether delay can be condoned
-
Interim injunction under Section 9 before arbitration begins, invoking a bank guarantee
What the courts said, word for word.
Real paragraphs from the judgments, with their citations. Open any of them to read the judgment.
Section 34(2-A) stipulates that an award may be set aside when it is vitiated by patent illegality appearing on the face of the award.
Likewise, erroneous application of law cannot be categorised as patent illegality.
It is a well-settled position in law that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator by one of the parties to the dispute is impermissible and invalid being contrary to the scheme of the Act.
Equal treatment of parties at the stage of appointment of an arbitrator ensures impartiality during the arbitral proceedings.
Questions
Does it cover arbitral awards?
No. It covers court judgments, including those that discuss awards.
Is the Arbitration Act searchable by section?
Search works on any Act: describe the point and mention the section. The section pages cover IPC, BNS, CrPC, BNSS, the Evidence Act, BSA and the Constitution.
Are foreign judgments included?
No. Misaal covers Indian courts only.