Civil and property
Civil and property disputes, by your facts.
Describe the agreement, the possession or the delay. Find the paragraphs that fit, with para, page and the original PDF.
-
Your facts, in your words
Landlord seeks eviction of tenant on bona fide need of the premises for his son
Find matching judgments
-
Strong match
Hukum Chandra v. Nemi Chand Jain
Supreme Court · [2018] 13 S.C.R. 909
Strong match
Babu Lal v. Rahul
Punjab and Haryana High Court · CR 3550/2022
Strong match
Delhi Development Authority v. Tejpal
Supreme Court · [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1211
-
Hukum Chandra v. Nemi Chand Jain[2018] 13 S.C.R. 909
In Gaya Prasad relying on earlier decisions, this Court held that the crucial date for deciding as to bona fide requirement of landlord is the date of his application for eviction.
Para 17 Open in the original PDF
Provisions that come up most.
Mention these in your description, along with the facts.
| Provision | What it's about |
|---|---|
| Section 16(c), Specific Relief Act | Readiness and willingness of the plaintiff |
| Section 5, Limitation Act | Condoning delay for sufficient cause |
| Order VII Rule 11, CPC | Rejection of a plaint |
| Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, CPC | Temporary injunctions |
| Section 100, CPC | Second appeal on a substantial question of law |
| State rent Acts | Bona fide need, subletting and arrears |
Try one of these.
Real descriptions you can paste into Misaal, then change to fit your matter.
-
Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell, plaintiff paid part of the price, readiness and willingness disputed
-
Landlord seeks eviction of tenant on bona fide need of the premises for his son
-
Appeal filed 200 days late, condonation of delay, whether government's internal file movement is sufficient cause
-
Plaint rejected under Order VII Rule 11 as barred by limitation, whether limitation can be decided at that stage
What the courts said, word for word.
Real paragraphs from the judgments, with their citations. Open any of them to read the judgment.
In Gaya Prasad relying on earlier decisions, this Court held that the crucial date for deciding as to bona fide requirement of landlord is the date of his application for eviction.
It is not in dispute that as per settled law eviction of a tenant on the ground of bona fide personal necessity of the premises can be sought by a landlord from non-residential building also under provisions of Section 13 (3)(a)(i) of the Act.
In addition to “sufficient cause”, Section 5 also requires that such cause must be shown within the prescribed period.
Section 5 of the Limitation Act requires sufficient cause to be shown before the delay in filing of an appeal can be condoned.
Questions
Are State rent Acts covered?
Misaal holds judgments, including those on State rent laws. It doesn't hold the text of the Acts.
Can I filter by year?
Yes, by court and by a range of years.
Does it cover trial court orders?
No. It covers the Supreme Court and the High Courts on the courts page.