Skip to content

Courts

Bombay High Court judgments, searched by your facts.

Sitting at Mumbai, with benches including Nagpur, Aurangabad and Goa. Search its judgments on bail, arbitration, writs and more, by your facts.

  1. Your facts, in your words

    Bail application, accused in custody, delay in trial and Article 21

    Find matching judgments

  2. Strong match

    State of Goa v. Ajay Gupta

    Bombay High Court · CRMAM 9/2026

    Strong match

    S.N. Naik and Brothers v. Union of India

    Bombay High Court · ARB 26/2023

    Strong match

    Jafar Babu Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

    Bombay High Court · REVN 36/2015

  3. State of Goa v. Ajay GuptaCRMAM 9/2026

    It is true that delay in trial violates a fundamental right of the accused person, but delay in trial by itself is not the sole consideration for grant of bail.
    Para 27

    Open in the original PDF

54,519

Bombay High Court judgments and orders in Misaal, from 1989 so far

Seat
Mumbai
Benches
Nagpur, Aurangabad, Goa and Kolhapur
How cases appear
Case types like APEAL, APL and CRA

From the Bombay High Court, word for word.

Real paragraphs, with their citations. Open any of them to read the judgment.

It is true that delay in trial violates a fundamental right of the accused person, but delay in trial by itself is not the sole consideration for grant of bail.
State of Goa v. Ajay Gupta CRMAM 9/2026, para 27 · Bombay High Court
The law enunciated is that there cannot be unilateral appointment of sole arbitrator or the majority members of the arbitral tribunal by one of the party to the dispute notwithstanding the prior contract to the contrary.
S.N. Naik and Brothers v. Union of India ARB 26/2023, para 11 · Bombay High Court
It is also settled position of law that presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act, is rebuttable and the consideration is based on preponderance of probabilities.
Jafar Babu Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra REVN 36/2015, para 11 · Bombay High Court
It was further held that right to life and personal liberty enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is overarching and sacrosanct.
Mohd Ali Azam Mohd Israfil Sheikh v. The State of Maharashtra APEAL 548/2024, para 8 · Bombay High Court

What you can do

Pick this court

Limit a search to the Bombay High Court and a range of years, or search all courts together.

Para and page

Each passage shows its paragraph and page. High Court judgments are identified by case number.

The original PDF

Open the judgment at that page, with the lines highlighted.

Check a draft

Check case names and quotations from the Bombay High Court in your draft.

Questions

Are Nagpur, Aurangabad and Goa bench orders included?

Where the public dataset has them, yes. Real results on this page include Goa bench matters.

Does it cover every order?

No. We keep judgments and reasoned orders from the dataset, not every short order.

Can I cite from it?

Read the judgment in the PDF, and cite it by its case number and date.

Search the Bombay High Court.